Prediction of Bobbie Miller vs Sheila Piercey Summers Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Miller vs S. Piercey Summers

Bobbie Miller

RSA

0

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Sheila Piercey Summers

RSA

0

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Miller 0 - 3 Summers

They have played 6 sets in total, with Bobbie Miller winning 0 and Sheila Piercey Summers winning 6. The last match between Sheila Piercey Summers and Bobbie Miller was at the Johannesburg, 18-03-1948, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Sheila Piercey Summers getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Miller	0
Summers	3

Last 4 H2H Matches:

() Johannesburg(03-18-48)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Bobbie Miller

(SF) Johannesburg(03-27-47)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Bobbie Miller

(SF) Johannesburg(03-30-39)

Stats

Sheila Piercey Summers

Bobbie Miller

B. Miller vs S. P. Summers H2H Profile

B. Miller	Stats	S. P. Summers
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
82.22% (37-8)	Career Total W/L	74.29% (130-45)
0	Clay	3
0	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Miller vs S. P. Summers Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bobbie Miller has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bobbie Miller, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Bobbie Miller has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sheila Piercey Summers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Bobbie Miller has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Sheila Piercey Summers winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Bobbie Miller has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 88% (W/L 22/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 75% (W/L 15/5). Sheila Piercey Summers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 88% (W/L 69/18), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 64% (W/L 16/9).
Player level: In the last year, Bobbie Miller has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Sheila Piercey Summers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Bobbie Miller winning 0 times and Sheila Piercey Summers being victorious 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bobbie Miller winning 0 and Sheila Piercey Summers winning 6.
The last match between Bobbie Miller and Sheila Piercey Summers was at the Johannesburg, 18-03-1948, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Sheila Piercey Summers getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bobbie Miller has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sheila Piercey Summers has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bobbie Miller has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sheila Piercey Summers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Bobbie Miller has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sheila Piercey Summers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Bobbie Miller vs Sheila Piercey Summers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Miller vs S. P. Summers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Miller	Stats	S. P. Summers
0	H2H Matches Won	3
0	Sets Won	6
21	Games Won	38
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
0% (0/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (3/3)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Miller Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg - 18-03-1948
Sheila Piercey SummersS. Piercey	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R4 Joy MottramJ. Mottram	W	6-4 2-6 7-5	Stats
Cape Town - 02-01-1948
SF Toodles WatermeyerT. Watermeyer	L	4-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
Johannesburg - 27-03-1947
SF Sheila Piercey SummersS. Piercey	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
R3 Stella Van CollerS. Van	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

S. P. Summers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg - 19-03-1951
F Hazel Redick SmithH. Redick	W	8-6 2-6 7-5	Stats
Port Elizabeth RSA vs USA - 19-04-1950
Robin Shirley FryS. Fry	L	5-7 6-1 6-1	Stats
Durban RSA vs USA - 15-04-1950
Robin Doris HartD. Hart	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Johannesburg - 30-03-1950
Julia WipplingerJ. Wipplinger	W	6-1 6-4	Stats
SF Shirley FryS. Fry	L	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Miller vs S. P. Summers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Miller	Stats	S. P. Summers
82.22% (37/8)	YTD Win/Loss	74.29% (130/45)
75.28% (67/22)	Sets Win/Loss	71.85% (268/105)
62.39% (491/296)	Games Win/Loss	60.25% (1989/1312)
0% (0/0)	Hard Win/Loss	75.00% (6/2)
75.00% (15/5)	Clay Win/Loss	79.31% (69/18)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	70.91% (39/16)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	72.00% (18/7)
80% (32/40)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	74% (125/169)
67% (6/9)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (17/33)
91% (33/30)	1st Set Won, Won Match	91% (129/117)
9% (33/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (129/12)
29% (7/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	24% (42/10)